Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11 |
| 2015-10-01 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 285.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 10.67 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.2 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a score of 85.6, which is slightly better than the LG V10's 78.6 global score. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a noticeably newer device, and it's also incredibly thinner and just a little bit lighter than the LG V10. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Flip 3 has the newer 11 version while LG V10 has Android 5.1, offering a couple nice extra features.
The LG V10 features a much better screen than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher display density and a slightly higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution. The LG V10 has a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a quite better performance than LG V10, because it has 7 more CPU cores and 4 GB more RAM. The LG V10 captures much better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the LG V10 also has a back-facing camera with a much higher 16 MP resolution.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a little better battery lifetime than LG V10, because it has a 10 percent more battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG V10, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG V10. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, otherwise you can save some money and buy the LG V10, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.