Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-10-01 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Stainless steel | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 285.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.2 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is better than LG V10, having a 92.3 score against 78.6. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a more recent 11 version while LG V10 has Android 5.1, so it provides the user a couple additional features. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G construction is way newer, somewhat thinner and just a little lighter than LG V10.
The LG V10 features a much better display than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little greater amount of pixels per inch of screen and a little bit higher resolution of 2560 x 1440. Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a better CPU than LG V10, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores (and faster).
The LG V10 takes just a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a smaller camera sensor taking less light and dull colors, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the LG V10 also counts with a much more mega pixels back-facing camera and faster video frame rates.
The LG V10 has more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has just a bit longer battery life than LG V10, because it has a 3300mAh battery size.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a lot more expensive than LG V10, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.