Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11 |
| 2015-10-01 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 285.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 10.67 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.2 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is much better than the LG V10, having a global score of 90.6 against 78.6. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a more recent 11 version while LG V10 has Android 5.1. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a much newer and much thinner phone than LG V10, although it's also notably heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a quite superior hardware performance than LG V10, because it has 7 more CPU cores and 8 GB more RAM memory. The LG V10 counts with a much better looking screen than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a much smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels quantity in each inch of screen.
The LG V10 features a greater storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. LG V10 takes greater pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a camera with a much better resolution and a larger aperture to take better low light captures and videos.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a superior battery duration than LG V10, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.