Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.1 | Android 10 |
| 2015-10-01 | 2020-11-27 |
| 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown and White | Cool blue, Power black and Yellow |
| Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 285.00 | $ 149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.67 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V10 has a general score of 78.6, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Poco M3's general score of 78.2. LG V10's construction is a little lighter and somewhat thinner than Xiaomi Poco M3, even though it was released 5 years before. Both phones we are comparing here have Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V10 has the older 5.1 version and Xiaomi Poco M3 has Android 10 version.
Xiaomi Poco M3 has just a bit better hardware performance than LG V10, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also has 7 more cpu cores. LG V10 counts with a much better screen than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 and more pixels per screen inch.
The Xiaomi Poco M3 has a slightly better camera than LG V10, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also counts with a much larger sensor and a camera in the back with lot more MP.
The LG V10 features much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco M3, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage, the LG V10 also has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with a very superior battery duration than LG V10, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Although LG V10 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Xiaomi Poco M3, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Xiaomi Poco M3. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the LG V10, else you can save some dollars and get the Xiaomi Poco M3, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.