Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-03-09 | 2018-10-26 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ is just a bit better than the Apple iPhone XR, with a score of 82.5 against 82. Even when LG V30S ThinQ and Apple iPhone XR were only released 8 months apart, LG V30S ThinQ is lighter and somewhat thinner. LG V30S ThinQ has a bit more vivid screen than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with way more pixels per inch of display and a much higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB more internal memory. The iPhone XR has a bit more powerful processing unit than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and 2 lesser processing cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
The LG V30S ThinQ has a bit superior battery life than iPhone XR, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 2942mAh. IPhone XR has a slightly better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a worse video resolution, a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low light photography and video and a way worse 12 megapixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger sensor which offers a better photo and video quality.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it costs more money than iPhone XR, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the iPhone XR. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy LG V30S ThinQ, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the iPhone XR, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.