Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Asus |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-03-09 | 2018-10-29 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.25 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 3.63 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ is a bit better than Asus ROG Phone, with an 82.5 score against 77.1. LG V30S ThinQ is a noticeably lighter and thinner cellphone than the Asus ROG Phone, even though both of them were only released with a couple of months difference. The Asus ROG Phone counts with a little faster processing unit than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Asus ROG Phone also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a bit sharper screen than Asus ROG Phone, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a greater pixel number per display inch. LG V30S ThinQ shoots way better photos and videos than Asus ROG Phone, because although it has a tinier sensor which gives a lower image and video quality and slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the LG V30S ThinQ also counts with a larger aperture to capture better photography and videos in low light situations.
The Asus ROG Phone has a bit more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage. Asus ROG Phone has greater battery performance than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the LG V30S ThinQ is also a bargain compared to the other devices, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.