Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-03-09 | 2016-10-20 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ has an overall score of 82.5, which is just a bit better than the Google Pixel's global score of 80.2. LG V30S ThinQ is a newer and somewhat thinner cellphone than the Google Pixel, although it's just a bit heavier. The LG V30S ThinQ counts with just a bit better screen than Google Pixel, because it has a way better resolution of 1440 x 2880, a bigger screen and a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel, because it has more RAM memory and a higher number of cores. The LG V30S ThinQ captures a bit better photographs and videos than Google Pixel, because although it has a much tinier camera sensor, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the LG V30S ThinQ also counts with a larger camera aperture and a back camera with much more mega-pixels.
The LG V30S ThinQ has much more storage for games and applications than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same internal memory, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB. LG V30S ThinQ counts with greater battery performance than Google Pixel, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy LG V30S ThinQ, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Google Pixel, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.