Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-03-09 | 2017-10-19 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ has a global score of 82.5, which is a bit better than Google Pixel 2 XL's score of 82.5. LG V30S ThinQ's design is just a bit thinner and a bit lighter than the Google Pixel 2 XL, even though they were only released with a few months difference. The LG V30S ThinQ and the Google Pixel 2 XL have really similar screens, both have a better count of pixels per inch of display, the same exact resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels and a display of the same size.
LG V30S ThinQ features a much better memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V30S ThinQ has a bit superior processor than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 2 XL features just a little better battery performance than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 7 percent more battery size. The LG V30S ThinQ counts with just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a smaller sensor shooting lower quality photos and videos, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video definition, the LG V30S ThinQ also counts with a way more mega-pixels back facing camera and a bigger aperture for better photos and video in low light environments.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Google Pixel 2 XL, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 2 XL. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy LG V30S ThinQ, else you can save some dollars and buy the Google Pixel 2 XL, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.