Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-03-09 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ has an overall score of 82.5, which is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 3's general score of 80. Even though the LG V30S ThinQ and Google Pixel 3 were released with only 7 months difference, LG V30S ThinQ's body is just a bit thinner but a little heavier. LG V30S ThinQ has a bit faster CPU than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a bit sharper screen than Google Pixel 3, because it has a little more pixels per inch in the screen, a better 1440 x 2880 resolution and a quite larger display. LG V30S ThinQ features a superior storage to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a SD memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The LG V30S ThinQ has just a bit better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity. The LG V30S ThinQ takes a little bit better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a smaller sensor which provides a lower image and video quality, and they both have the same video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the LG V30S ThinQ also counts with a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution and a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light captures and videos.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 3. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy LG V30S ThinQ, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Google Pixel 3, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.