Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-03-09 | 2019-05-07 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ is just a bit better than Google Pixel 3a, having a general score of 82.5 against 78.8. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but the LG V30S ThinQ has a newer 8.0 Oreo version and Google Pixel 3a has Android 11 version. The LG V30S ThinQ design is a little bit thinner than the Google Pixel 3a, although it is a little bit heavier and was released a little bit further than a year before.
The LG V30S ThinQ has a little faster CPU than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory. LG V30S ThinQ has a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 2880px, a bit more pixels per inch of screen and a little bit bigger screen.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a much bigger storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V30S ThinQ counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The LG V30S ThinQ features a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a tinier camera sensor taking lower quality photographs, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the LG V30S ThinQ also counts with a camera with a way higher resolution and a larger aperture.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more than Google Pixel 3a, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 3a. If you prefer to save some money, you can get the Google Pixel 3a, giving up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.