Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-03-09 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ has a general score of 82.5, which is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 4's 81.9 global score. Although the LG V30S ThinQ is older than Google Pixel 4, it's design is a little bit lighter and a little thinner. LG V30S ThinQ features a slightly better looking display than Google Pixel 4, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 2880px, a little bit greater display density and a little bigger display.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a way bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4, because it has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal memory capacity. Google Pixel 4 features a little faster CPU than LG V30S ThinQ. Both of them have 8 CPU cores and 6 GB of RAM memory.
The LG V30S ThinQ has greater battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh. LG V30S ThinQ takes clearer videos and photos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier sensor taking lower quality videos and photos, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the LG V30S ThinQ also counts with a camera with way more mega-pixels and a bigger aperture.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel 4, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 4. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy Google Pixel 4, giving up a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.