Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-03-09 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL is just a bit better than the LG V30S ThinQ, getting a general score of 82.9 against 82.5. Google Pixel 4 XL's body is newer, but just a little bit thicker and heavier than the LG V30S ThinQ. Google Pixel 4 XL features a slightly better screen than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a little inferior quantity of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3040px and a little bit bigger display.
The Google Pixel 4 XL features a bit more powerful processor than LG V30S ThinQ. Both have 6 GB of RAM memory and 8 cores. LG V30S ThinQ has a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier camera sensor which provides a lower image and video quality, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the LG V30S ThinQ also counts with a lot more MP back-facing camera and a bigger aperture to take better low light images.
LG V30S ThinQ has a superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has more internal memory and a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Google Pixel 4 XL has a little longer battery life than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity.
Google Pixel 4 XL not only is the best devices of the ones we compare here, but it's also by far the cheapest, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.