Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-03-09 | 2020-08-20 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a has a score of 82.9, which is just a bit better than LG V30S ThinQ's 82.5 overall score. The Google Pixel 4a body is a lot newer and just a little lighter than LG V30S ThinQ's, although it's just a bit thicker. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Google Pixel 4a has the previous 11 version while LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The LG V30S ThinQ has a bit more powerful processing unit than Google Pixel 4a. Both of them have 8 cpu cores and the same RAM amount. The LG V30S ThinQ has a little sharper display than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a just a little better screen pixels density, a little larger display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880.
LG V30S ThinQ features a much greater memory to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have equal internal storage, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V30S ThinQ takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor taking lower quality videos and photos, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the LG V30S ThinQ also counts with a bigger aperture and a back facing camera with lot more MP.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with just a little bit longer battery life than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity.
Google Pixel 4a is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest one, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.