Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-03-09 | 2020-11-19 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Clearly white and Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a general score of 87.5, which is a bit better than the LG V30S ThinQ's general score of 82.5. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but Google Pixel 4a 5G has older 11 version while LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo. Even though the Google Pixel 4a 5G is notably newer than LG V30S ThinQ, it's just a bit thicker and a little bit heavier.
The LG V30S ThinQ features a little more vivid display than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px and more pixels per inch of screen. LG V30S ThinQ has much more storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with just a little better performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G. Both of them have the same RAM amount and 8 processing cores. The Google Pixel 4a 5G features longer battery performance than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 3885mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh. The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a little bit better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low light images and video, a worse video definition and a camera with much less mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
Google Pixel 4a 5G not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.