Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-03-09 | 2020-10-15 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 is slightly better than the LG V30S ThinQ, having a score of 89 against 82.5. Google Pixel 5's construction is newer and just a little bit lighter, but just a bit thicker than the LG V30S ThinQ. The Google Pixel 5 features a CPU that is very similar to the processor in LG V30S ThinQ, and although the Google Pixel 5 has a greater amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
LG V30S ThinQ has a little bit better screen than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a little bit greater screen pixel density and a higher 1440 x 2880px resolution. Google Pixel 5 has a slightly better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a worse (4K) video definition, a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for shooting photos in low light environments and a lot less mega-pixels camera, it also counts with a larger sensor providing a higher image quality.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Google Pixel 5 counts with better battery duration than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 4080mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Google Pixel 5 is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.