Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 92.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-03-09 | 2024-03-22 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 8.36 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Agate Grey and Frozen Berry |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 930.00 | $ 1389.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| P-OLED | LTPO |
| 537 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| -- | 5000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 10.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 24 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 1 TB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 23.2 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has an overall score of 92.1, which is much better than the LG V30S ThinQ's 82.5 score. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design's body is notably newer, but thicker and much heavier than the LG V30S ThinQ. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has older 14 version while LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a little faster processor than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has a higher amount of RAM. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has an incredibly better looking screen than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a bit worse 1280 x 2800 resolution and a little bit worse screen pixel density, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a way bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal storage. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a superior battery life than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 5600mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a lot better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have the same video quality, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has a way larger sensor, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photography in low light environments, a lot better resolution back camera and faster 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is a lot more expensive than the LG V30S ThinQ, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.