Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | HTC |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-03-09 | 2017-02-21 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 537 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ has a general score of 82.5, which is a bit better than the HTC U Ultra's 77 global score. LG V30S ThinQ is a newer phone, and it's also a little lighter and just a little thinner than the HTC U Ultra. The LG V30S ThinQ has a bit superior processor than HTC U Ultra, because it has more RAM memory and a greater number of cores.
LG V30S ThinQ has a slightly better looking screen than HTC U Ultra, because it has a just a little better quantity of pixels per inch of display, a quite better 1440 x 2880 resolution and a little bit larger screen. LG V30S ThinQ has a bigger memory for games and applications than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V30S ThinQ also has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The LG V30S ThinQ and the HTC U Ultra both count with very similar cameras, because although the HTC U Ultra has a worse 3840x2160 video quality, a camera with a way worse 12 megapixels resolution and a tinier aperture which is worse for taking photographs and videos in low-light situations, it also counts with a much larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The LG V30S ThinQ features a little longer battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 3300mAh battery size.
The LG V30S ThinQ is more expensive than HTC U Ultra, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.