Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | HTC |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-03-09 | 2017-05-18 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 537 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ has a score of 82.5, which is a little bit better than the HTC U11's general score of 77.6. LG V30S ThinQ is a newer device, and it's also a little lighter and just a bit thinner than the HTC U11. HTC U11 features a screen that is just as good as the screen in LG V30S ThinQ, although the HTC U11 has a just a bit worse display density, a bit worse 1440 x 2560 resolution and a little bit smaller display.
The LG V30S ThinQ features a much better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC U11, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V30S ThinQ features a bit faster processing unit than HTC U11, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has more RAM memory.
The LG V30S ThinQ has a little longer battery duration than HTC U11, because it has a 10 percent larger battery size. The HTC U11 has a camera that's just as good as the camera in LG V30S ThinQ, because although the HTC U11 has a worse (4K) video definition, a camera with much less MP and a tinier aperture which is not so good for low light images and videos, it also counts with a larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the HTC U11, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as HTC U11. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy LG V30S ThinQ, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the HTC U11, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.