Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2018-03-09 | 2018-11-09 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ is a little bit better than LG G7 Fit, getting an 82.5 score against 77. Both phones in this review have Android OS (operating system), but LG V30S ThinQ has older 8.0 Oreo version and LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo. The LG V30S ThinQ construction is just a little bit thinner but just a little bit heavier than LG G7 Fit, and both of them were released only 8 months apart.
LG V30S ThinQ has a bit superior CPU than LG G7 Fit, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores (and also faster). The LG G7 Fit has a more vivid screen than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 3120, a just a little higher pixels amount per inch in the screen and a bit bigger display.
The LG V30S ThinQ features a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V30S ThinQ also has 128 GB internal storage capacity. LG V30S ThinQ captures a little bit better videos and photos than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same video resolution and the same resolution back camera, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a lot bigger aperture to take better images in low light environments and a bigger sensor which provides a better photo and video quality.
The LG V30S ThinQ features just a bit longer battery duration than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 10 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.