Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-03-09 | 2020-11-23 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blue, Red and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ has a score of 82.5, which is just a bit better than LG K52's score of 76. The LG V30S ThinQ body is thinner and lighter than LG K52, even though it was released 3 years before. Both phones in this review have Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V30S ThinQ has the newer 8.0 Oreo version while LG K52 has Android 10 version.
The LG V30S ThinQ features a bit better hardware performance than LG K52, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The LG V30S ThinQ features a sharper display than LG K52, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a way greater pixel density and a much better 1440 x 2880 resolution.
The LG V30S ThinQ has a better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG K52, and although they both have an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V30S ThinQ also has more internal storage. The LG K52 counts with a camera that's very similar to the camera in LG V30S ThinQ, because although the LG K52 has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same (Full HD) video definition and the same video frame rate, it also counts with a camera with a much higher 48 megapixels resolution and a lot bigger camera sensor capturing lot better quality photos.
The LG K52 has better battery duration than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 21% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.