Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-03-09 | 2020-11-27 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Sky Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ is just a bit better than the LG K62, having an 82.5 score against 78.2. Both phones in this review use Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V30S ThinQ has a newer 8.0 Oreo version while LG K62 has Android 10, so it counts with some extra features and enhanced performance. LG V30S ThinQ is an incredibly older phone than the LG K62, but LG managed to build it lighter and somewhat thinner.
The LG V30S ThinQ has a sharper screen than LG K62, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better 1440 x 2880 resolution and a much better pixels amount per inch in the display. LG V30S ThinQ has a little better processing power than LG K62, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG V30S ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The LG V30S ThinQ and the LG K62 both count with similar cameras, because although the LG K62 has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition and the same video frame rates, it also counts with a much larger back camera sensor which offers a lot higher photo and video quality and a much better 48 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
The LG K62's storage to store more apps and games is very similar to LG V30S ThinQ's one, both have a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and equal 128 GB internal memory capacity. LG K62 has improved battery performance than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 21 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.