Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-03-09 | 2020-11-06 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Titan gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 930.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K92 is slightly better than the LG V30S ThinQ, having an 85.4 score against 82.5. The LG K92 body is way newer, but incredibly heavier and thicker than the LG V30S ThinQ. Both of these devices come with Android OS, but the LG K92 has an older 10 version while LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The LG V30S ThinQ features a bit superior processing unit than LG K92. They have 6 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core processor. The LG V30S ThinQ has a slightly better looking screen than LG K92, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixels number per inch of screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels.
LG K92 and LG V30S ThinQ count with extremely similar memory for applications, games, photos and videos, both of them have a SD card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB and the same 128 GB internal storage capacity. LG K92 has a much better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for shooting photographs and/or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the LG K92 also counts with a much more megapixels camera in the back and a much larger camera sensor.
LG K92 features improved battery lifetime than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 21 percent greater battery size.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, LG K92 is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.