Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-03-09 | 2020-05-07 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mirror black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 930.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ has a score of 82.5, which is slightly better than the LG Q70's global score of 77.9. LG V30S ThinQ is an extremely older phone than the LG Q70, but it is a bit thinner and incredibly lighter anyway. Both phones in this comparison include Android operating system, but the LG V30S ThinQ has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version and LG Q70 has Android 10.
LG V30S ThinQ has a little bit better screen than LG Q70, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880. The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a quite bigger memory for apps and games than LG Q70, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB, the LG V30S ThinQ also has more internal storage capacity.
LG V30S ThinQ has a bit faster processing unit than LG Q70, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory. LG Q70 has a bit better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for shooting photos or videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the LG Q70 also counts with a back camera with a way better resolution and a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking better quality photographs.
The LG Q70 has superior battery performance than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG Q70, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG Q70. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the LG V30S ThinQ, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the LG Q70, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.