Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-03-09 | 2020-05-20 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Holographic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | $ 233.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ is just a bit better than the LG Stylo 6, with an 82.5 score against 76.7. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS (operating system), but the LG V30S ThinQ has newer 8.0 Oreo version while LG Stylo 6 has Android 10. Despite of the fact that the LG V30S ThinQ is extremely older than the LG Stylo 6, it's construction is thinner and notably lighter.
LG V30S ThinQ features a slightly better looking display than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels and a higher pixels count per inch in the display. LG V30S ThinQ features just a bit better hardware performance than LG Stylo 6, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V30S ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM.
LG V30S ThinQ has a greater storage capacity for applications and games than LG Stylo 6, and although they both have an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB, the LG V30S ThinQ also has 128 GB internal storage capacity. LG Stylo 6 counts with greater battery duration than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 21% greater battery size.
LG V30S ThinQ captures just a bit better videos and photos than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor taking less light and washed colors, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better low light photos, a way better 3840x2160 video resolution and a higher 16 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG Stylo 6, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG Stylo 6. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy LG Stylo 6, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.