Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-03-09 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ is just a bit better than LG V35 ThinQ, getting a score of 82.5 against 81.3. The LG V30S ThinQ has the same thickness and weight than LG V35 ThinQ. The LG V35 ThinQ has just a little better hardware performance than LG V30S ThinQ. Both have 6 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit more vivid screen than LG V30S ThinQ. Both of them have a screen of the same size, exactly the same 1440 x 2880 resolution and the same amount of pixels in each display inch. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a slightly better camera than LG V30S ThinQ. They have a F1.6 aperture, a same resolution back camera, the same video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 video definition and a same size camera sensor.
LG V30S ThinQ features a greater memory to store more apps and games than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB, the LG V30S ThinQ also has 128 GB internal storage. The LG V35 ThinQ's battery life is just as good as the battery life in LG V30S ThinQ.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG V35 ThinQ. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy LG V30S ThinQ, else you can save some money and buy the LG V35 ThinQ, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.