Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-03-09 | 2020-03-20 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ has a score of 87.6, which is a bit better than LG V30S ThinQ's 82.5 score. Although LG V60 ThinQ is newer than LG V30S ThinQ, it is somewhat thicker and much heavier. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V60 ThinQ has an older 11 version while LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with a bit superior CPU than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM. The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a little more vivid display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher amount of pixels per inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880.
The LG V60 ThinQ's storage capacity for games and applications is very similar to the LG V30S ThinQ one, both have a SD extension slot that holds up to 1,95 TB and the same internal storage capacity. LG V60 ThinQ shoots clearer videos and photos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a way larger sensor which offers a way better photo and video quality, a lot better resolution camera and a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
The LG V60 ThinQ has a very superior battery performance than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
The LG V60 ThinQ is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.