Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-03-09 | 2020-05-15 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is slightly better than the LG V30S ThinQ, getting an 87.1 score against 82.5. LG Velvet's design is newer, but a bit thicker and heavier than LG V30S ThinQ. LG V30S ThinQ has a bit faster processing unit than LG Velvet. Both of them have a 6 GB RAM and the same number of cores. The LG V30S ThinQ has a little more vivid display than LG Velvet, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels quantity per screen inch and a better 1440 x 2880 resolution.
LG Velvet counts with as much memory to store more apps and games as LG V30S ThinQ, they have an external memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB and the same 128 GB internal storage. LG Velvet takes much clearer videos and photos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the LG Velvet also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot better quality pictures and a camera with lot more mega-pixels.
LG Velvet features superior battery duration than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 4300mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, LG Velvet is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.