Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-03-09 | 2020-10-15 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Wing is much better than LG V30S ThinQ, getting a 91.2 score against 82.5. LG Wing's design is notably newer, but a lot thicker and notably heavier than LG V30S ThinQ. Both devices in this comparison have Android OS (operating system), but the LG Wing has older 10 version while LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo.
LG V30S ThinQ features a slightly better display than LG Wing, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution and a better pixels density. The LG V30S ThinQ and the LG Wing both have extremely similar CPUs, and although the LG Wing has a larger amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The LG Wing has a very superior camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the LG Wing also counts with a back camera with much more mega pixels, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor taking lot better quality photos and videos and better 60 fps video frame rates.
LG Wing features a bigger storage for apps and games than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG Wing also has more internal memory capacity. The LG Wing counts with greater battery performance than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
LG Wing costs a bit more than the LG V30S ThinQ, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.