Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Microsoft |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-03-09 | 2020-09-10 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 7.36 x 5.72 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 8.82 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Glacier |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | $ 540.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 8.1 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2700 x 1800 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 11.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3577mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ is a little bit better than the Microsoft Surface Duo, having an 82.5 score against 78.8. Both of these devices work with Android OS (operating system), but the LG V30S ThinQ has 8.0 Oreo version while Microsoft Surface Duo has Android 10 version. The LG V30S ThinQ is a older and extremely thicker phone than Microsoft Surface Duo, but LG made it way lighter anyway.
Microsoft Surface Duo counts with just a bit better performance than LG V30S ThinQ. They have 8 CPU cores and a 6 GB RAM memory. The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a little sharper display than Microsoft Surface Duo, because although it has a quite lower 1440 x 2880 resolution and a way smaller display, it also counts with a better quantity of pixels per inch in the screen.
The LG V30S ThinQ has a superior camera than Microsoft Surface Duo, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the LG V30S ThinQ also counts with a way better resolution back facing camera and a bigger aperture. LG V30S ThinQ has a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Microsoft Surface Duo, and although they both have the same internal storage, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Microsoft Surface Duo counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has an 8% more battery size.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Microsoft Surface Duo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Microsoft Surface Duo. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the LG V30S ThinQ, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Microsoft Surface Duo, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.