Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-03-09 | 2021-06-17 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.69 x 3.08 x 0.43 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 8.18 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Forged Green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ has a score of 82.5, which is a bit better than the Motorola Defy (2021)'s global score of 77.2. The LG V30S ThinQ construction is extremely thinner and way lighter than Motorola Defy (2021), despite of the fact that it was released many years before. Both phones in this review come with Android OS (operating system), but LG V30S ThinQ has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version while Motorola Defy (2021) has Android 11 version, so it provides some nice extra features.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a little bit better processing power than Motorola Defy (2021), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V30S ThinQ also has more RAM memory. The LG V30S ThinQ features a much more vibrant display than Motorola Defy (2021), because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a way better 1440 x 2880px resolution and a lot better number of pixels per inch of display.
The LG V30S ThinQ has a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Defy (2021), because it has more internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola Defy (2021) has a much longer battery life than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Motorola Defy (2021) has a much better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low light photos, and they both have the same (Full HD) video quality, the Motorola Defy (2021) also counts with better 60 fps video frame rate, a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution back camera and a much larger sensor shooting lot better quality pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.