Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-03-09 | 2021-08-19 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.53 x 2.99 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Electric Graphite and Lagoon Green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853V/ZA (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 Lite has an overall score of 87.1, which is just a bit better than LG V30S ThinQ's 82.5 global score. Even though Motorola Edge 20 Lite is extremely newer than the LG V30S ThinQ, it is somewhat heavier and just a little thicker. These devices use Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 20 Lite has an older 11 version while LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a little bit better looking display than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution and a better amount of pixels per inch of display. LG V30S ThinQ has a bit better processor than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The LG V30S ThinQ features a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB. Motorola Edge 20 Lite features a much better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 20 Lite also counts with faster 120 fps video frame rate and a camera in the back with a much better resolution.
Motorola Edge 20 Lite counts with a much longer battery lifetime than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.