Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 12, 11 |
| 2018-03-09 | 2021-08-19 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a global score of 92.8, which is better than LG V30S ThinQ's general score of 82.5. Both phones we compare here have Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 20 Pro has the older 12 version while LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Although Motorola Edge 20 Pro is way newer than the LG V30S ThinQ, it's heavier and just a bit thicker.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a bit better processor than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have 8 cores, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has more RAM. The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a little bit better looking screen than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better display density and a better 1440 x 2880 resolution.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro captures much clearer videos and photos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low light captures and video, it also counts with a way more mega pixels camera in the back and a lot better video resolution. The LG V30S ThinQ has a way bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro has better battery life than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.