Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 12 |
| 2018-03-09 | 2022-08-18 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mineral Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 930.00 | $ 498.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge (2022) has a general score of 84.7, which is slightly better than LG V30S ThinQ's general score of 82.5. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge (2022) has an older 12 version while LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Motorola Edge (2022) is a a lot newer device than the LG V30S ThinQ, although it is just a little thicker and a bit heavier.
Motorola Edge (2022)'s CPU is just as good as the LG V30S ThinQ one, both have 8 processing cores and the same RAM amount. LG V30S ThinQ counts with a bit sharper display than Motorola Edge (2022), because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and a better quantity of pixels per inch of display.
The Motorola Edge (2022) takes much better photographs and videos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Edge (2022) also counts with a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels and faster video frame rates.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a superior memory for applications and games than Motorola Edge (2022), and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the LG V30S ThinQ also has an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. Motorola Edge (2022) features a much better battery performance than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Motorola Edge (2022) is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.