Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 12 |
| 2018-03-09 | 2022-09-08 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ has an overall score of 82.5, which is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion's score of 78.5. These phones use Android operating system, but LG V30S ThinQ has the newer 8.0 Oreo version and Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12, so it provides you a couple additional features and performance tweaks. Despite of the fact that the LG V30S ThinQ is notably older than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, it's construction is just a bit thinner and a little lighter.
LG V30S ThinQ features a very superior performance than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a bit more vivid screen than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a way lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a bit less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a quite larger display.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a way better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for low light captures and video, it also counts with a way bigger back camera sensor which gives a much higher photo and video quality, a much higher 7680x4320 video definition and a way better resolution camera.
The LG V30S ThinQ features a much greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a SD extension slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features longer battery performance than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.