Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 13 |
| 2018-03-09 | 2023-04-04 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Interstellar Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro is slightly better than the LG V30S ThinQ, with an 83.4 score against 82.5. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 40 Pro has older 13 version while LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Although the Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a lot newer than the LG V30S ThinQ, it's a lot heavier and thicker.
The LG V30S ThinQ features a very superior CPU than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has 6 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a slightly better screen than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has much less pixels per screen inch and a way worse 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a greater camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for low light images, it also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality, a way higher resolution camera in the back and a way higher 7680x4320 video definition.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a very superior storage for applications and games than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a way better battery duration than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 4600mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.