Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-03-09 | 2024-08-29 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo, with an 82.5 score against 81.9. The LG V30S ThinQ is an much older phone than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, but it's a bit lighter and just a little bit thinner anyway. These phones work with Android OS, but LG V30S ThinQ has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version while Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14 version, offering some extra features and better performance.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a brighter display than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a quite lower 1256 x 2760 pixels resolution and a just a little worse display density, it also counts with a bit bigger screen. LG V30S ThinQ counts with a much better performing processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
LG V30S ThinQ has a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola Edge 50 Neo has improved battery performance than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 4310mAh battery size.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a much better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a back facing camera with a much better resolution and a much larger sensor shooting much higher quality photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.