Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-03-09 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro is just a bit better than LG V30S ThinQ, getting an 86.3 score against 82.5. Motorola Edge 50 Pro's construction is extremely newer, but a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier than LG V30S ThinQ. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 50 Pro has an older 14 version while LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The LG V30S ThinQ features a much better performing CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a little more vivid screen than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a lot worse 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a much worse pixel density, it also counts with a little larger display.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro shoots much better photos and videos than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a larger camera aperture to capture better images and videos in low light environments, a lot bigger sensor providing a way higher image quality and a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a bit more memory capacity to store more apps and games than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal memory. Motorola Edge 50 Pro has better battery lifetime than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 36 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.