Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-03-09 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a general score of 87.1, which is slightly better than the LG V30S ThinQ's 82.5 general score. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's body is newer, but somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker than the LG V30S ThinQ. These phones have Android OS, but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an older 14 version while LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a brighter display than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a much worse pixel density, it also counts with a quite bigger screen. The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a really superior processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a lot better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same aperture, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has better 60 fps video frame rates, a way larger sensor and a lot higher resolution camera. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a slightly better memory capacity for applications and games than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has longer battery duration than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 36% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.