Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-03-09 | 2020-12-07 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | LTPS |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ is slightly better than Moto G 5G, getting an 82.5 score against 81.5. These devices come with Android OS, but LG V30S ThinQ has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version while Moto G 5G has Android 10 version, so it gives some additional features and enhanced performance. LG V30S ThinQ is an way older cellphone than Moto G 5G, but it's notably thinner and way lighter anyway.
LG V30S ThinQ has just a bit better display than Motorola Moto G 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a better 1440 x 2880 resolution. LG V30S ThinQ has a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The LG V30S ThinQ has a lot bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto G 5G, because it has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory. Moto G 5G has a much better battery performance than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Moto G 5G features a much better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low light photos, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video definition, the Moto G 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with a much better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.