Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-03-09 | 2020-07-08 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Surfing blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus is a bit better than LG V30S ThinQ, with a general score of 82.6 against 82.5. The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus is a incredibly newer phone than the LG V30S ThinQ, although it is somewhat thicker and a lot heavier. The LG V30S ThinQ has a bit sharper display than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better count of pixels per inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 2880 resolution.
LG V30S ThinQ features much more storage capacity for games and applications than Moto G 5G Plus, because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage. LG V30S ThinQ has a little better hardware performance than Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has more RAM memory.
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus shoots better photos and videos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus also counts with a way bigger sensor capturing lot better quality photos and videos and a much higher resolution camera in the back.
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus counts with a very superior battery lifetime than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.