Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-03-09 | 2020-08-28 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Forest green and Sapphire blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ has an overall score of 82.5, which is slightly better than Moto G9 Play's global score of 76.7. The LG V30S ThinQ construction is thinner and noticeably lighter than Moto G9 Play, despite of the fact that it was released 3 years before. These devices have Android OS (operating system), but the LG V30S ThinQ has newer 8.0 Oreo version while Moto G9 Play has Android 10 version.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a much more vibrant screen than Motorola Moto G9 Play, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a much greater pixel quantity per inch in the display and a lot better 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution. LG V30S ThinQ counts with just a bit better processing power than Moto G9 Play, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Moto G9 Play has a better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light images and videos, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Moto G9 Play also counts with a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera, a way larger camera sensor which gives a lot better image and video quality and better video frame rate.
LG V30S ThinQ features a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than Moto G9 Play, because it has an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola Moto G9 Play counts with a superior battery lifetime than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.