Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2018-03-09 | 2016-09-01 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 930.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ is a bit better than Motorola Moto Z Force, getting an 82.5 score against 75.8. These devices include Android OS, but the LG V30S ThinQ has a newer 8.0 Oreo version and Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version. Even though LG V30S ThinQ is just a little thicker than Motorola Moto Z Force, it's just a little bit lighter and newer.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a bit better performance than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has more cpu cores and a larger amount of RAM memory. LG V30S ThinQ counts with just a bit better screen than Moto Z Force, because it has a just a bit greater pixel count in each inch of display, a little larger screen and a bit higher 1440 x 2880 resolution.
Motorola Moto Z Force captures clearer photos and videos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for taking pictures or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Moto Z Force also counts with a much more mega pixels camera in the back.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a quite bigger storage to store more games and applications than Moto Z Force, and although they both have a SD extension slot that allows up to 1,95 TB, the LG V30S ThinQ also has 64 GB more internal storage. Moto Z Force features a bit longer battery lifetime than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 6% bigger battery size.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Moto Z Force. So if you need that extra features, you can buy LG V30S ThinQ, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola Moto Z Force, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.