Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-03-09 | 2017-08-10 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 930.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ is a little bit better than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, with a global score of 82.5 against 77.4. Although it's the best device in this comparison, LG V30S ThinQ is a somewhat thicker and a little heavier device than Moto Z2 Force Edition. Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a display that's very similar to LG V30S ThinQ's screen, although the Moto Z2 Force Edition has a little bit less pixels per display inch, a little smaller screen and a bit worse 1440 x 2560px resolution.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V30S ThinQ also has 64 GB more internal memory. The LG V30S ThinQ features just a little better performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V30S ThinQ also has more RAM.
The LG V30S ThinQ has superior battery performance than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 3300mAh battery size instead of 2730mAh. LG V30S ThinQ has a bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a smaller sensor which offers a lower image and video quality, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the LG V30S ThinQ also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to take better captures in low-light environments and a much higher 16 MP resolution camera.
LG V30S ThinQ is more expensive than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.