Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-03-09 | 2018-06-29 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ has a general score of 82.5, which is a little bit better than Moto Z3 Play's 76.3 global score. Although it's the best phone in our current comparison, we must highlight that it is also just a little bit thicker and just a bit heavier. The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a little better processing power than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a little sharper display than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have a display of the same size, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a greater display pixels density. The LG V30S ThinQ features more memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V30S ThinQ also has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The LG V30S ThinQ captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a smaller sensor taking worse quality videos and images, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate, the LG V30S ThinQ also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture and a lot better 16 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back.
LG V30S ThinQ has just a little better battery duration than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 10% bigger battery size.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola Moto Z3 Play, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Moto Z3 Play. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy Motorola Moto Z3 Play, giving up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.