Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-03-09 | 2020-09-18 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Oxford blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 930.00 | $ 398.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One 5G is just a bit better than LG V30S ThinQ, with a overall score of 84.6 against 82.5. The Motorola One 5G body is incredibly newer, but thicker and noticeably heavier than LG V30S ThinQ. The LG V30S ThinQ features a little faster processor than Motorola One 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM.
The LG V30S ThinQ features just a bit better looking screen than Motorola One 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel count per inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 2880px resolution. LG V30S ThinQ counts with a better storage for applications and games than Motorola One 5G, and although they both have equal internal memory, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Motorola One 5G has a superior camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for taking photos in low light environments, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video quality, the Motorola One 5G also counts with a back facing camera with a much better resolution and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing much higher quality videos and photos.
Motorola One 5G counts with a really longer battery duration than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Motorola One 5G not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.