Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-03-09 | 2021-01-14 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 930.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | LTPS |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ is a little bit better than Motorola One 5G Ace, with an 82.5 score against 81.6. LG V30S ThinQ's design is extremely lighter and a lot thinner than the Motorola One 5G Ace, although it was released 3 years before. The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a bit superior processor than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a bit more vivid display than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2880 resolution and more pixels per inch in the display. LG V30S ThinQ counts with much more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola One 5G Ace, because it has 128 GB internal memory and an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Motorola One 5G Ace has a better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for taking pictures or videos in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Motorola One 5G Ace also counts with a back-facing camera with a much higher resolution.
The Motorola One 5G Ace features a much longer battery life than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 52 percent bigger battery size.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola One 5G Ace, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola One 5G Ace. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get Motorola One 5G Ace, letting go some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.