Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-03-09 | 2019-08-16 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 930.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ has a global score of 82.5, which is a bit better than Motorola One Action's 78.5 global score. Despite of the fact that LG V30S ThinQ is older than Motorola One Action, it's construction is thinner and somewhat lighter. The LG V30S ThinQ has a little better hardware performance than Motorola One Action, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
LG V30S ThinQ features a little more vivid screen than Motorola One Action, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2880px resolution and a quite higher display density. The LG V30S ThinQ features a little bit better camera than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a bigger aperture for better photography in low light environments and a back camera with a way higher resolution.
The LG V30S ThinQ features a quite bigger memory for apps and games than Motorola One Action, and although they both have equal internal storage, the LG V30S ThinQ also has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola One Action features just a little better battery duration than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 6% greater battery capacity.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola One Action, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola One Action. So if you want that extra features, you can buy LG V30S ThinQ, else you can save some dollars and get the Motorola One Action, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.