Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-03-09 | 2019-12-04 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 930.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ is just a bit better than the Motorola One Hyper, getting a global score of 82.5 against 79.8. Both phones we compare here have Android OS (Operating System), but LG V30S ThinQ has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version and Motorola One Hyper has Android 11 version, so it offers a couple nice extra features. LG V30S ThinQ's design is notably lighter and somewhat thinner than Motorola One Hyper, although it was released around 21 months before.
LG V30S ThinQ has a bit superior processor than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM. The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a bit better display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixels count per inch of display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880.
Motorola One Hyper has a much better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light captures, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a back facing camera with a lot better resolution.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a better storage for apps and games than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have the same internal storage, the LG V30S ThinQ also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola One Hyper counts with improved battery life than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 21 percent larger battery size.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola One Hyper, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola One Hyper. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy Motorola One Hyper, giving up some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.