Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-03-09 | 2019-05-15 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blue and Brown |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ has a general score of 82.5, which is a little bit better than the Motorola One Vision's general score of 80.7. Even though the LG V30S ThinQ is older than the Motorola One Vision, it's design is thinner and somewhat lighter. LG V30S ThinQ features a little more vivid display than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels.
LG V30S ThinQ has a little better hardware performance than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM. Motorola One Vision takes much better photos and videos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for taking images in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola One Vision also counts with a way more mega pixels back-facing camera and a much larger sensor taking much better quality photos.
The LG V30S ThinQ has a very superior storage to install games and applications than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola One Vision counts with a little longer battery life than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 3500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.