Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-03-09 | 2019-09-05 |
| 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 930.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ is a bit better than Motorola One Zoom, with a overall score of 82.5 against 80. The LG V30S ThinQ is an older phone than the Motorola One Zoom, but LG managed to build it somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. LG V30S ThinQ has just a little better performance than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM.
LG V30S ThinQ features a little more vivid display than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel number in each inch of display and a better 1440 x 2880 resolution. LG V30S ThinQ counts with a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the LG V30S ThinQ also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Motorola One Zoom has improved battery performance than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh. The Motorola One Zoom shoots better videos and photos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video definition, the Motorola One Zoom also counts with a lot larger sensor taking much better quality videos and photographs and a lot better 48 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola One Zoom, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola One Zoom. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the LG V30S ThinQ, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Motorola One Zoom, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.